Former Marsh Supermarkets CEO Don Marsh ordered to pay $2.2 million
Jury returns verdict late Friday
Last Updated: 123 days ago
INDIANAPOLIS - Federal jurors ordered the former CEO of Marsh Supermarkets to pay $2.2 million after siding with the company late Friday in a lawsuit that alleged he used the company as his "personal checkbook."
The supermarket chain had sued Don Marsh, accusing the 75-year-old of defrauding it of millions of dollars to finance extravagant trips and buy expensive gifts for friends and family.
After a two-week trial, a federal jury in Indianapolis decided that Marsh committed fraud and must pay $2.2 million in damages.
Jurors reached the verdict around 11 p.m., after about six hours of deliberations.
The company, which has about 100 stores in Indiana and Ohio, alleged that Marsh abused his authority as CEO "to facilitate his covert use of its coffers as his own personal checkbook." Marsh said the lawsuit was an effort to tarnish his reputation.
In closing arguments earlier Friday, an attorney for the supermarket chain argued that Marsh should be ordered to repay at least $7 million to the company. The lawsuit alleged he wasted millions of dollars in company money during his last six years as CEO.
Marsh's attorney, Andrew McNeil, argued that the former executive didn't commit fraud. McNeil said the supermarket's board knew of Marsh's spending and that his actions didn't violate the company policies or his contract.
He acknowledged his client "is not perfect, he is not a saint, but he gave everything he had to Marsh Supermarkets." But McNeil argued that the company that bought Marsh Supermarkets in 2006, and dismissed Marsh as CEO, was trying to use "different rules that didn't exist at the time Don Marsh was there."
After the verdict, McNeil expressed disappointment.
"Obviously, we're disappointed, but we'll continue to go forward and consider our options," said attorney Andrew McNeill, who represents Marsh.
Company attorney David Herzog reminded the jury about how Marsh testified that he didn't believe he fell under the company's code of conduct as CEO. March had repeatedly cited "oversight" as a reason for spending company money on dozens of personal trips, expenses on mistresses and gifts for friends and family.
"Mr. Marsh cannot be honest with himself because the truth is too hard to swallow," Herzog told jurors.
After the verdict, Herzog said he appreciated the work of the jury.
"We're thoroughly pleased," said attorney David Herzog, who represents the company. "(The jury) worked very hard. They had a difficult job to do and they did it very well."
The company and Marsh were unable to reach a settlement with Marsh before the case went to court.
Follow Drew Smith on Twitter: @drewsmith1
Copyright 2013 Scripps Media, Inc. The Associated Press contributed to this report. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.