NewsCall 6 Investigates


Man serving 110 year sentence in 1983 rape case asks state to let him out of prison

Parole board holds hearing for Mike Floyd
Posted at 7:49 PM, Jun 11, 2018
and last updated 2018-06-12 10:58:55-04

INDIANAPOLIS — A Bloomington man convicted in a 1983 rape is asking the state to let him out of prison.

Mike Floyd has served 35 years for a Lawrence County crime he has always maintained he did not commit, but others don’t see it that way including the prosecutor who helped put him behind bars.

Floyd filed a clemency petition in September 2017, records show.

Monday, the Indiana Parole Board held a clemency hearing on the Floyd case.

Floyd appeared via video conference from Wabash Valley Correctional Facility, where he is serving a 110 year sentence for rape, conspiracy and criminal confinement.

“I deserve to be set free,” Floyd told the Indiana Parole Board. “I had no criminal record. I didn’t even have a speeding ticket prior to this case.”

At the clemency hearing, Floyd questioned why Ron Deckard, an acquaintance who admitted guilt in the 1983 case, was released from prison nearly 20 years ago.

As Call 6 Investigates reported, Deckard reached a plea deal in which he pleaded guilty in the incident to criminal confinement and conspiracy, and in exchange, prosecutors dismissed the rape charge.

Deckard served 15 years in prison and was released in 1999, according to the Indiana Department of Correction.

“I’ve served 35 years and that is a long time,” Floyd told the parole board Monday. “Nobody was killed. I’m sorry for what happened to the victim, but any violence done in this case the evidence shows it was clearly done by Ron Deckard and Ron Deckard alone.”

Several Floyd supporters spoke to the Indiana Parole Board including Floyd’s brother and mother.

“If I thought for one minute he was guilty, he wouldn’t have made it to the prison,” said Ruth Floyd, Mike Floyd’s mother. “I just pray to god you let your conscience be your guide.”

Former IU administrator Don Cross also spoke to the Indiana Parole Board on Floyd’s behalf.

“Because the rape kit has been destroyed, he has no recourse now,” said Cross. “You’re it.”

As Call 6 Investigates reported in February, Bedford Police destroyed the rape kit in 1995.

Floyd pointed to an FBI report that showed semen found on the victim’s underwear was blood type A while Floyd has blood type O.

However, the prosecutor who handled the 1983 case said what Floyd did not mention is that another sample from inside the victim was the same blood type as Floyd.

Former prosecutor Don Hickman wrote a three page letter to the Indiana Parole Board opposing Floyd’s release.  Read the full text of his letter below or click here.




“Floyd just won’t quit,” read the statement. “Floyd has the charming ability to tell just enough of the truth to make his accompanying lies seem believable. But in the end, his lies are just that-- lies.”

Hickman said he never offered Floyd a plea agreement, despite Floyd’s claims that he had done so.

“The sentencing judge was correct in sentencing Floyd to 110 years,” said Hickman in his statement to the board. “An unrepentant, pathologically lying rapist is exactly where he belongs-- in prison until he has served his entire sentence."

The Indiana Parole Board questioned Floyd as to why he hasn’t submitted full records, including court transcripts.

"We don't get the full record from you, and parts we do get give more doubts about whether you're giving us the full story," said parole board member Charles Miller. “To be clear, Mr. Floyd, every issue you have presented to us in your petition for clemency has been addressed by a trial court, an appellate court, a post-conviction court, a post conviction appellate court, a federal court and a federal habeas court.”

The Indiana Parole Board considers a slew of factors including the severity of the crime, whether the prisoner has been rehabilitated, and public safety.

"Ultimately the safety of our Hoosiers, yes," said Gwen Horth, chair of the Indiana Parole Board. “Most of the individuals who do apply are those with long term sentences so our murderers, rapists and child molesters.”

The Indiana Parole Board is a fact-finding entity that provides a recommendation to the Governor who can then decide whether to accept or reject that recommendation.

Without the Governor intervening, Floyd will be released in 2037.

Floyd’s post-conviction attorney, Jess Paul of Indianapolis, will likely help Floyd gather more documents for the parole board.

“Clemency would certainly be appropriate,” said Jess Paul in an interview with RTV6. “Even if he were guilty, even if one would think he were guilty, the system let him down.  Simply because the evidence was mishandled, it wasn’t presented properly to the jury.”

Paul said Floyd’s court-appointed attorney in 1983 was defending his first rape case, and said the defense attorney missed numerous opportunities including not calling Floyd’s mother to testify on the stand as an alibi witness.

“It is the most frustrating case I have ever been involved in in my practice,” said Paul.  “It was certainly a tragedy for the victim, but it has grown into a large tragedy for Michael. I believe the appellate system let him down in a most egregious way.”

Jess Paul said Mike Floyd wanted to go forward with DNA testing, knowing it could prove his guilt, but they later they learned the evidence was destroyed.

“The fellow who kidnapped her, put the gun to her head, put in the trunk, mishandled her through the entire event has been out since 1999, approaching 20 years, and Michael is due to stay in another 20 years,” said Paul. “It’s something that shouldn’t have happened to any citizen.”


June 1, 2018


Indiana Parole Board

302 W. Washington St., Rm. E321

Indianapolis, IN  46204-2278



            DOC Number 29443

To Whom It May Concern:

I write in response to the Clemency petition filed by Michael J. Floyd, prisoner number 29443.  I was the prosecuting attorney that tried the case against him in Lawrence Circuit Court in1983.  Let me say from the outset that I am firmly opposed to any grant of clemency or a pardon for him.  He’s an unrepentant rapist and his current petition confirms that.

Floyd maintains that he is innocent but a jury didn’t see it that way.  Floyd makes several arguments in support of his position but those arguments have all been adjudicated against him.  As usual he is not telling the truth in his retelling of the case.  Rather than refute his arguments one by one, I will respond to only three to show his pattern of deceit.

One, he complains on page 23 of his petition about the “loss” of his alibi witness.  His mother had been listed as his alibi witness and, as such, would have had to remain outside the courtroom during the trial due to a separation of witnesses order.  However, she remained in the courtroom throughout the trial, thus rendering herself ineligible to testify. 

Floyd complains that this was caused by his attorney’s error saying on page 24 of his clemency petition that her testimony “. . . was lost by McSoley’s violation of the witness separation order.”  Further on he says that “Surely there can be no tactical reason for counsel to violate a witness separation order.”

His lie is exposed on page one of the trial transcript where his lawyer, immediately after the judge ordered all the witnesses to leave the courtroom, stated:  “Your Honor, for the record the defendant’s mother, Mrs. Floyd, had been listed as a witness for discovery purposes but the decision has been made not to call her as a witness and she will be staying in the courtroom.”

Whether McSoley had discussed this decision with his client prior to announcing it we do not know.  But it was announced right in front of him.  We do not know what the tactical reason was but it was right there in the open.  He never raised the issue on appeal but only later when he claimed ineffective assistance of counsel in his Post-Conviction Relief petitions.  To now claim that his lawyer “violated” the court’s order is disingenuous at best but really just an outright lie.  He knew she was not going to be called as a witness and he acquiesced in that decision.

A second major argument of Floyd’s is that there were stains on the victim’s underwear that were made by someone with Type A blood and both Floyd and the victim have Type O.  The Type A stains were dealt with at his PCR hearing when it was pointed out that the victim’s boyfriend was Type A and she had had consensual sex with him earlier. 

Floyd takes four pages of his petition (pages 20 – 23) to complain about how his attorney didn’t present the blood type evidence, that there was a stain on the victim’s underwear created by someone with Type A blood and that he is Type O.  However, he does not mention in his petition that seminal fluid was removed from the victim’s vagina by the examining doctor and tested.  It contained sperm and was deposited by someone with Type O blood.  Floyd is Type O.  That is the evidence in the lab report from the FBI but Floyd failed to mention it.  While not dispositive, the fact is that Floyd is not excluded by the test results as he tries to claim.  No one argued that Floyd was the donor of the Type A stain but he clearly could have been the donor of the motile sperm found in the victim that were Type O. 

A third argument that Floyd makes is that he should be believed because he turned down plea offers on two separate occasions saying that he couldn’t plead guilty to something he didn’t do.  I understand that sentiment and agree with him.  I never wanted a defendant to plead guilty to something he didn’t do.  But once again Floyd is not telling the truth.  Floyd was never made any plea offers whatsoever.  I never made him any offers prior to trial other than to plead guilty as charged and have a sentencing hearing.  Further, neither Jim Gallagher, the chief deputy prosecutor who handled the PCR hearing in 1997, nor Scott Callahan, the elected prosecuting attorney at that time, ever made any offers to Floyd.  None.

Floyd’s other arguments are similarly flawed.  The evidence was carefully considered by the jury and Floyd was found guilty.  The Supreme Court reviewed the case and affirmed his conviction.  Floyd also filed two PCR (Post-Conviction Relief) petitions and raised all these same issues again plus a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel.  Both petitions were fully adjudicated on the merits and he lost both.  Neither PCR petition was heard by the original judge in the case nor was the State represented by me, the original prosecutor.  Successor prosecutors and judges have reviewed his claims and found them meritless.

Floyd just won't quit.  Twelve years ago he filed a Motion to Correct Erroneous Sentence even though the Supreme Court had previously held that his sentence was fully within the parameters of the law and that the sentencing judge had acted appropriately.  His Motion was denied.

Floyd has the charming ability to tell just enough of the truth to make his accompanying lies seem believable.  But in the end, his lies are just that -- lies.  The sentencing judge was correct in sentencing Floyd to 110 years.  An unrepentant, pathologically lying rapist is exactly where he belongs -- in prison until he has served his entire sentence.



Donald J. Hickman

MORE TOP STORIES |  Family: Ella Whistler was shot 7 times at Noblesville West Middle School | One dead, three injured following accident at Lake Freeman in White County | Charges filed against 13-year-old Noblesville school shooter, will not be charged as adult | Greenwood woman killed by falling branch while jogging at Eagle Creek Park | Johnson Co. Sheriff warns of possible police impersonator

Top Trending Videos